I wholeheartedly agree with the tenets of this post. I believe the choice of Tim Walz was very shrewd. And I believe not choosing Shapiro was shrewd as well. In fact, each candidate had a lot to bring to the table, and each being an opinion leader among his own constituency will enable the “unchosen” to lead the fight for electing Kamala…
I wholeheartedly agree with the tenets of this post. I believe the choice of Tim Walz was very shrewd. And I believe not choosing Shapiro was shrewd as well. In fact, each candidate had a lot to bring to the table, and each being an opinion leader among his own constituency will enable the “unchosen” to lead the fight for electing Kamala Harris and Tim Walz come November. I can guarantee someone, somewhere, will find something negative to say about Tim Walz such as today’s WAPO article criticizing Walz’ time in the National Guard. It was an unnecessarily long piece delineating what two or three people felt were not in keeping with their impression of Walz’ service. Bring on the joy, bring in the win, VOTE BLUE.
I wholeheartedly agree with the tenets of this post. I believe the choice of Tim Walz was very shrewd. And I believe not choosing Shapiro was shrewd as well. In fact, each candidate had a lot to bring to the table, and each being an opinion leader among his own constituency will enable the “unchosen” to lead the fight for electing Kamala Harris and Tim Walz come November. I can guarantee someone, somewhere, will find something negative to say about Tim Walz such as today’s WAPO article criticizing Walz’ time in the National Guard. It was an unnecessarily long piece delineating what two or three people felt were not in keeping with their impression of Walz’ service. Bring on the joy, bring in the win, VOTE BLUE.